User:ArchieMosley890

From JFCMorfin
Jump to navigation Jump to search

down site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for several selected sound sources. Another cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You must share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It has a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. And when it's in that state, you should discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. This is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.

If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps that may be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it is a block after a large amount of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the business level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to share data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.

Also visit my web-site :: p2p 사이트